fintech-algorithms
Using a coding agent? Give it the skill: npx skills add IslamBaraka90/Fintech-Algorithms-Library What it does →

Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives

Install and import#

bash
npm install fintech-algorithms
ts
import { highestHighAndLowestLowPrimitives } from "fintech-algorithms/geometric-chart-patterns/market-structure-breakouts-and-regimes/highest-high-and-lowest-low-primitives";

Signature#

highestHighAndLowestLowPrimitives(input)

The two rolling extremes every breakout rule is built on: the highest high and lowest low over a window of period bars ending at, and including, the current bar.

Parameters#

NameTypeNotes
inputTopicInputbars is the required OHLCV history, strictly ordered by timestamp and on a single adjustment basis. parameters.period (default 20, integer of at least 2) sets the window length.

Returns#

TopicResult

series and latest carry highest and lowest. The warm-up is period - 1 bars because the window includes the current bar, so with the default ready_at is 19 - one bar earlier than the breakout topics that exclude it.

Warm-up#

The first period - 1 bars (19 by default) positions are null. The window spans indices i-period+1 through i inclusive, so index period - 1 is the first with a full window.

Errors#

  • When period is supplied as a non-integer or as a value below 2 — throws Error
  • When a bar's high or low is not a finite number — throws Error

Complexity: time O(n × period), space O(n).

Worked example#

executed Captured by running this function on the input its own test provides. Real output of real code — but not asserted against a published figure.

Input#

input
{
  "bars": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-02",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 100,
      "high": 101.45,
      "low": 98.695,
      "close": 100,
      "volume": 750000,
      "benchmark": 200
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-03",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 101.49111452,
      "high": 103.38381693,
      "low": 100.05480022,
      "close": 101.78791214,
      "volume": 795117,
      "benchmark": 200.56326135
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-04",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 102.45519048,
      "high": 104.6701838,
      "low": 100.91147007,
      "close": 102.9549389,
      "volume": 840234,
      "benchmark": 201.11020913
    }
  ],
  "parameters": {}
}

Call#

highestHighAndLowestLowPrimitives(input)

Returns#

object with 9 fields: topic_id, title, state, ready, ready_at, series, latest, parameters, …

{
  "topic_id": "D08-F07-A01",
  "title": "Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives",
  "state": "calculated",
  "ready": true,
  "ready_at": 19,
  "series": {
    "highest": [null, null, null, null, null, null],
    "lowest": [null, null, null, null, null, null]
  },
  "latest": {
    "highest": 109.83623682,
    "lowest": 98.68874251
  },
  "parameters": {},
  "diagnostics": {
    "causal": true,
    "input_count": 96
  }
}

Diagrams#

Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives — article hero
Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives — concept map
Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives — decision comparison
Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives — worked example

Calculation flow#

Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives calculation flow
flowchart LR
    A["ordered OHLC observations, explicit lookbacks and threshol"] --> B["Validate order, basis, and finite values"]
    B --> C["Apply the selected Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives convention"]
    C --> D["Emit value, readiness, and diagnostics"]
    D --> E["Interpret descriptively; test outcomes separately"]
    B -->|invalid or insufficient| X["Withhold output with a reason"]
Highest-High and Lowest-Low Primitives readiness and evidence states
stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Waiting
    Waiting --> Ready: enough valid causal observations
    Waiting --> Rejected: malformed or unsupported input
    Ready --> Calculated: selected formula applied
    Calculated --> Interpreted: diagnostic and limitation retained
    Interpreted --> Ready: next observation arrives
    Rejected --> Waiting: corrected input and deterministic reset

How it works#

This page states the contract — how to call it correctly. The article explains the concept: why it works, and where it breaks.

Read the article →

References#

  • CFA Institute technical-analysis overview — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • TA-Lib maintained source — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • Evidence decision
  • Level 1 evidence map

The rest of the Market Structure, Breakouts, and Regimes family#