Capped Free-Float Market-Cap Index
Install and import#
npm install fintech-algorithmsimport { calculate } from "fintech-algorithms/index-and-benchmark-engineering/weighting-and-capping/capped-free-float-market-cap-index";Signature#
calculate(data)Float weighting with a ceiling on any single constituent. Regulation and mandate limits require it, and the redistribution is subtler than it looks: capping one name lifts the others, which can push a second name over the cap.
Parameters#
| Name | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
data | { ids: string[]; marketValues: number[]; cap: number } | cap is the maximum weight any one constituent may hold, as a fraction. The routine iterates until every weight is compliant. |
Returns#
{ ids, weights, cap, iterations, maxWeight, weightSum }
Compliant weights plus iterations and maxWeight, so the redistribution can be checked rather than assumed to have converged.
Errors#
- When cap is not between 0 and 1 — throws
- When the cap is mathematically unsatisfiable — cap × count < 1 — throws
Complexity: time O(n × iterations),
space O(n).
Worked example#
verified This is the worked example published in the article, replayed by the test suite on every run. The output cannot drift.
Input#
{
"ids": ["A", "B", "C", "D", "E"],
"marketValues": [48, 24, 14, 9, 5],
"cap": 0.3
}Call#
calculate(data)Returns#
object with 6 fields: ids, weights, cap, iterations, maxWeight, weightSum
{
"ids": ["A", "B", "C", "D", "E"],
"weights": [0.3, 0.3, 0.2, 0.128571, 0.071429],
"cap": 0.3,
"iterations": 3,
"maxWeight": 0.3,
"weightSum": 1
}Diagrams#
Calculation flow#
Capped Free-Float Market-Cap Index calculation flow
flowchart LR
A["Point-in-time inputs"] --> B["Validate units and timing"]
B --> C{"Contract feasible?"}
C -->|No| D["Reject with reason"]
C -->|Yes| E["Calculate Capped Free-Float Market-Cap Index"]
E --> F["Recompute invariants"]
F --> G{"Checks pass?"}
G -->|No| D
G -->|Yes| H["Publish audited output"]
Capped Free-Float Market-Cap Index methodology state
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> FrozenInputs
FrozenInputs --> Validated: contract passes
FrozenInputs --> Rejected: missing or infeasible
Validated --> Calculated: apply named rule
Calculated --> Audited: invariants pass
Calculated --> Rejected: invariant fails
Audited --> Published: version and timestamp recorded
Published --> Revised: approved correction
Revised --> FrozenInputs: rebuild from retained source state
How it works#
This page states the contract — how to call it correctly. The article explains the concept: why it works, and where it breaks.
References#
- S&P Dow Jones Indices Index Mathematics Methodology — S&P Dow Jones Indices
- S&P DJI Equity Indices Policies & Practices — S&P Dow Jones Indices
- FTSE Russell Capping Methodology — FTSE Russell, LSEG
- FTSE Russell Index Policy and Methodology Library — FTSE Russell, LSEG
- MSCI Global Investable Market Indexes Methodology Library — MSCI
- MSCI Minimum Volatility Indexes Methodology — MSCI
- S&P Risk Control 2.0 Indices Methodology — S&P Dow Jones Indices
- Principles for Financial Benchmarks — International Organization of Securities Commissions
- Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 — European Union
- Portfolio Selection — Harry Markowitz
- On the Properties of Equally-Weighted Risk Contributions Portfolios — Sébastien Maillard, Thierry Roncalli, and Jérôme Teïletche
- Fundamental Indexation — Robert Arnott, Jason Hsu, and Philip Moore
- FTSE Currency Hedging Methodology Overview — FTSE Russell, LSEG