Range Efficiency Ratio
Install and import#
npm install fintech-algorithmsimport { rangeEfficiencyRatio } from "fintech-algorithms/technical-indicators/range-and-volatility-indicators/range-efficiency-ratio";Signature#
rangeEfficiencyRatio(input)Range Efficiency Ratio: the absolute net close-to-close move across period bars divided by the sum of the high-low ranges over the same span.
Parameters#
| Name | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
input | TopicInput | bars is the required OHLCV array -- each bar carries timestamp, open, high, low, close, volume and an optional basis, strictly ordered by timestamp. From parameters this topic reads only period (default 14, integer >= 2), which sets both the close lookback and the range-summing window. |
Returns#
TopicResult
series holds a single key, value, a 0-1 efficiency reading; latest.value is its last value. The warm-up is period leading nulls, so ready_at is 14 at the default period.
Warm-up#
The first `period` bars (14 at the default period) positions are null. The numerator compares the close against the close period bars earlier, so it needs one more bar than the range window does. value is also null on any bar where the summed range is zero.
Errors#
- When
parameters.periodis not an integer >= 2 — throws Error - When a bar is missing open, high, low, close, or volume, or one of them is not a finite number — throws Error
- When bars are not strictly ordered by timestamp, or a bar's high is below its open, low, or close — throws Error
Complexity: time O(n * period),
space O(n).
Worked example#
executed Captured by running this function on the input its own test provides. Real output of real code — but not asserted against a published figure.
Input#
{
"bars": [
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-02",
"basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
"open": 100,
"high": 101.45,
"low": 98.695,
"close": 100,
"volume": 750000,
"benchmark": 200
},
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-03",
"basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
"open": 101.49111452,
"high": 103.38381693,
"low": 100.05480022,
"close": 101.78791214,
"volume": 795117,
"benchmark": 200.56326135
},
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-04",
"basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
"open": 102.45519048,
"high": 104.6701838,
"low": 100.91147007,
"close": 102.9549389,
"volume": 840234,
"benchmark": 201.11020913
}
],
"parameters": {}
}Call#
rangeEfficiencyRatio(input)Returns#
object with 9 fields: topic_id, title, state, ready, ready_at, series, latest, parameters, …
{
"topic_id": "D07-F06-A09",
"title": "Range Efficiency Ratio",
"state": "calculated",
"ready": true,
"ready_at": 14,
"series": {
"value": [null, null, null, null, null, null]
},
"latest": {
"value": 0.07606679254426744
},
"parameters": {},
"diagnostics": {
"causal": true,
"input_count": 96
}
}Diagrams#
Calculation flow#
Range Efficiency Ratio calculation flow
flowchart LR
A["ordered OHLC observations with session calendar, previous "] --> B["Validate order, basis, and finite values"]
B --> C["Apply the selected Range Efficiency Ratio convention"]
C --> D["Emit value, readiness, and diagnostics"]
D --> E["Interpret descriptively; test outcomes separately"]
B -->|invalid or insufficient| X["Withhold output with a reason"]
Range Efficiency Ratio readiness and evidence states
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Waiting
Waiting --> Ready: enough valid causal observations
Waiting --> Rejected: malformed or unsupported input
Ready --> Calculated: selected formula applied
Calculated --> Interpreted: diagnostic and limitation retained
Interpreted --> Ready: next observation arrives
Rejected --> Waiting: corrected input and deterministic reset
How it works#
This page states the contract — how to call it correctly. The article explains the concept: why it works, and where it breaks.
References#
- TA-Lib function groups — see linked primary or authoritative record
- TA-Lib C/C++ API — see linked primary or authoritative record
- TA-Lib maintained source — see linked primary or authoritative record
- Evidence decision
- Level 1 evidence map