fintech-algorithms
Using a coding agent? Give it the skill: npx skills add IslamBaraka90/Fintech-Algorithms-Library What it does →

Ehlers Decycler

Install and import#

bash
npm install fintech-algorithms
ts
import { ehlersDecycler } from "fintech-algorithms/statistical-time-series/hilbert-and-ehlers-cycle-analytics/ehlers-decycler";

Signature#

ehlersDecycler(input)

Subtracts a two-pole high-pass residual from close, leaving a trend line with the sub-period wiggle removed and far less lag than a moving average of the same span. Any contract failure is rethrown as an Error whose message begins topic calculation failed: .

Parameters#

NameTypeNotes
inputTopicInputbars is a non-empty array of rows with timestamp, open, high, low, close and volume, strictly ordered by timestamp. This topic genuinely uses parameters.period, which defaults to 20 and must be an integer of at least 4; it sets the high-pass cutoff coefficient and so decides which cycles are removed.

Returns#

TopicResult

Two series, both mirrored in latest: high_pass is the removed high-frequency residual and value is close minus that residual, in price units. parameters echoes the supplied parameters and diagnostics reports causal and input_count. There is no null prefix at all, so the warm-up is zero bars and ready_at is 0.

Warm-up#

The first 0 positions are no nulls are emitted. The high-pass recursion holds its first two outputs at zero rather than leaving them null, so high_pass is defined from index 0 and value simply equals close there. ready_at is 0, but the opening bars are seed values rather than converged filter output.

Errors#

  • When parameters.period is present but is not an integer of at least 4 — throws Error
  • When bars is empty, a timestamp is missing or not strictly increasing, an OHLCV field is not finite, volume is negative, or high and low do not bracket open and close — throws Error

Complexity: time O(n), space O(n).

Worked example#

executed Captured by running this function on the input its own test provides. Real output of real code — but not asserted against a published figure.

Input#

input
{
  "bars": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-02",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 100,
      "high": 101.45,
      "low": 98.695,
      "close": 100,
      "volume": 750000,
      "benchmark": 200
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-03",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 101.49111452,
      "high": 103.38381693,
      "low": 100.05480022,
      "close": 101.78791214,
      "volume": 795117,
      "benchmark": 200.56326135
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-04",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 102.45519048,
      "high": 104.6701838,
      "low": 100.91147007,
      "close": 102.9549389,
      "volume": 840234,
      "benchmark": 201.11020913
    }
  ],
  "parameters": {}
}

Call#

ehlersDecycler(input)

Returns#

object with 9 fields: topic_id, title, state, ready, ready_at, series, latest, parameters, …

{
  "topic_id": "D09-F06-A08",
  "title": "Ehlers Decycler",
  "state": "calculated",
  "ready": true,
  "ready_at": 0,
  "series": {
    "high_pass": [
      0,
      0,
      -0.46270692883549364,
      -1.335377436005075,
      -2.201684726094235,
      -2.614761522250397
    ],
    "value": [
      100,
      101.78791214,
      103.41764582883549,
      104.56766012600508,
      105.03298485609423,
      104.8834874922504
    ]
  },
  "latest": {
    "high_pass": -1.4080590702156108,
    "value": 101.39887354021562
  },
  "parameters": {},
  "diagnostics": {
    "causal": true,
    "input_count": 96
  }
}

Diagrams#

Ehlers Decycler — article hero
Ehlers Decycler — concept map
Ehlers Decycler — decision comparison
Ehlers Decycler — worked example

Calculation flow#

Ehlers Decycler calculation flow
flowchart LR
    A["uniformly sampled finite prices with declared prefilter, c"] --> B["Validate order, basis, and finite values"]
    B --> C["Apply the selected Ehlers Decycler convention"]
    C --> D["Emit value, readiness, and diagnostics"]
    D --> E["Interpret descriptively; test outcomes separately"]
    B -->|invalid or insufficient| X["Withhold output with a reason"]
Ehlers Decycler readiness and evidence states
stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Waiting
    Waiting --> Ready: enough valid causal observations
    Waiting --> Rejected: malformed or unsupported input
    Ready --> Calculated: selected formula applied
    Calculated --> Interpreted: diagnostic and limitation retained
    Interpreted --> Ready: next observation arrives
    Rejected --> Waiting: corrected input and deterministic reset

How it works#

This page states the contract — how to call it correctly. The article explains the concept: why it works, and where it breaks.

Read the article →

References#

  • TA-Lib cycle indicator group — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • SciPy analytic-signal documentation — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • TA-Lib maintained source — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • Evidence decision
  • Level 1 evidence map

The rest of the Hilbert and Ehlers Cycle Analytics family#