fintech-algorithms
Using a coding agent? Give it the skill: npx skills add IslamBaraka90/Fintech-Algorithms-Library What it does →

Volatility Quality Index

Install and import#

bash
npm install fintech-algorithms
ts
import { volatilityQualityIndex } from "fintech-algorithms/technical-indicators/range-and-volatility-indicators/volatility-quality-index";

Signature#

volatilityQualityIndex(input)

Volatility Quality Index: accumulates each bar's true range signed by the direction of its close, then smooths the running total with an exponential moving average.

Parameters#

NameTypeNotes
inputTopicInputbars is the required OHLCV array -- each bar carries timestamp, open, high, low, close, volume and an optional basis, strictly ordered by timestamp. From parameters this topic reads only period (default 14, integer >= 2), the EMA length applied to the cumulative signed range.

Returns#

TopicResult

series holds raw, the signed true range contributed by each bar, and value, the EMA of the running total of raw. latest carries the last of each. raw has no warm-up at all -- it is zero on the first bar and populated from there on -- which is why ready_at is 0; value carries period - 1 leading nulls.

Warm-up#

The first 0 bars for `raw`, `period - 1` bars for `value` (13 at the default period) positions are null. raw is defined from the first bar, so the result reports ready at index 0 even though value is still null there. Callers reading latest.value on a short history must check for null themselves.

Errors#

  • When parameters.period is not an integer >= 2 — throws Error
  • When a bar is missing open, high, low, close, or volume, or one of them is not a finite number — throws Error
  • When bars are not strictly ordered by timestamp, or a bar's high is below its open, low, or close — throws Error

Complexity: time O(n), space O(n).

Worked example#

executed Captured by running this function on the input its own test provides. Real output of real code — but not asserted against a published figure.

Input#

input
{
  "bars": [
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-02",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 100,
      "high": 101.45,
      "low": 98.695,
      "close": 100,
      "volume": 750000,
      "benchmark": 200
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-03",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 101.49111452,
      "high": 103.38381693,
      "low": 100.05480022,
      "close": 101.78791214,
      "volume": 795117,
      "benchmark": 200.56326135
    },
    {
      "timestamp": "2024-01-04",
      "basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
      "open": 102.45519048,
      "high": 104.6701838,
      "low": 100.91147007,
      "close": 102.9549389,
      "volume": 840234,
      "benchmark": 201.11020913
    }
  ],
  "parameters": {}
}

Call#

volatilityQualityIndex(input)

Returns#

object with 9 fields: topic_id, title, state, ready, ready_at, series, latest, parameters, …

{
  "topic_id": "D07-F06-A06",
  "title": "Volatility Quality Index",
  "state": "calculated",
  "ready": true,
  "ready_at": 0,
  "series": {
    "raw": [
      0,
      3.3838169299999947,
      3.758713730000011,
      3.9386350599999957,
      -3.829996080000001,
      -3.4696505999999943
    ],
    "value": [null, null, null, null, null, null]
  },
  "latest": {
    "raw": -3.1208633100000043,
    "value": 12.394917882563625
  },
  "parameters": {},
  "diagnostics": {
    "causal": true,
    "input_count": 96
  }
}

Diagrams#

Volatility Quality Index — article hero
Volatility Quality Index — concept map
Volatility Quality Index — decision comparison
Volatility Quality Index — worked example

Calculation flow#

Volatility Quality Index calculation flow
flowchart LR
    A["ordered OHLC observations with session calendar, previous "] --> B["Validate order, basis, and finite values"]
    B --> C["Apply the selected Volatility Quality Index convention"]
    C --> D["Emit value, readiness, and diagnostics"]
    D --> E["Interpret descriptively; test outcomes separately"]
    B -->|invalid or insufficient| X["Withhold output with a reason"]
Volatility Quality Index readiness and evidence states
stateDiagram-v2
    [*] --> Waiting
    Waiting --> Ready: enough valid causal observations
    Waiting --> Rejected: malformed or unsupported input
    Ready --> Calculated: selected formula applied
    Calculated --> Interpreted: diagnostic and limitation retained
    Interpreted --> Ready: next observation arrives
    Rejected --> Waiting: corrected input and deterministic reset

How it works#

This page states the contract — how to call it correctly. The article explains the concept: why it works, and where it breaks.

Read the article →

References#

  • TA-Lib function groups — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • TA-Lib C/C++ API — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • TA-Lib maintained source — see linked primary or authoritative record
  • Evidence decision
  • Level 1 evidence map

The rest of the Range and Volatility Indicators family#