Classic and Floor-Trader Pivot Points
Install and import#
npm install fintech-algorithmsimport { classicAndFloorTraderPivotPoints } from "fintech-algorithms/geometric-chart-patterns/pivots-and-levels/classic-and-floor-trader-pivot-points";Signature#
classicAndFloorTraderPivotPoints(input)Projects the classic floor-trader pivot and two resistance/support pairs for each bar from the previous bar's high, low, and close. The pivot is (H + L + C) / 3, r1/s1 reflect it across the prior low and high, and r2/s2 add and subtract the prior bar's range.
Parameters#
| Name | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
input | TopicInput | bars is the required OHLCV history, strictly ordered by timestamp and on a single adjustment basis. This variant reads no keys from parameters, but the family still validates period (default 20) as an integer of at least 2 whenever it is supplied. |
Returns#
TopicResult
series and latest carry pivot, r1, s1, r2 and s2. The warm-up is one bar: index 0 has no prior bar to derive levels from, so ready_at is 1 for any input of two or more bars.
Warm-up#
The first 1 bar positions are null. Every level at index i is computed from bar i-1 only, so index 0 is null across all five series and ready_at settles at 1.
Errors#
- When a bar's
highis below its ownopen,close, orlow(orlowis above them) — throws Error - When
periodis supplied as a non-integer or as a value below 2 — throws Error
Complexity: time O(n),
space O(n).
Worked example#
executed Captured by running this function on the input its own test provides. Real output of real code — but not asserted against a published figure.
Input#
{
"bars": [
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-02",
"basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
"open": 100,
"high": 101.45,
"low": 98.695,
"close": 100,
"volume": 750000,
"benchmark": 200
},
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-03",
"basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
"open": 101.49111452,
"high": 103.38381693,
"low": 100.05480022,
"close": 101.78791214,
"volume": 795117,
"benchmark": 200.56326135
},
{
"timestamp": "2024-01-04",
"basis": "synthetic-unadjusted",
"open": 102.45519048,
"high": 104.6701838,
"low": 100.91147007,
"close": 102.9549389,
"volume": 840234,
"benchmark": 201.11020913
}
],
"parameters": {}
}Call#
classicAndFloorTraderPivotPoints(input)Returns#
object with 9 fields: topic_id, title, state, ready, ready_at, series, latest, parameters, …
{
"topic_id": "D08-F01-A05",
"title": "Classic and Floor-Trader Pivot Points",
"state": "calculated",
"ready": true,
"ready_at": 1,
"series": {
"pivot": [
null,
100.04833333333333,
101.74217643000001,
102.84553092333333,
103.11026585,
102.75204238333333
],
"r1": [
null,
101.40166666666667,
103.42955264000003,
104.77959177666666,
105.14059180000001,
104.70666929666666
],
"s1": [
null,
98.64666666666666,
100.10053593000004,
101.02087804666665,
101.20195674000001,
100.87667321666666
],
"r2": [
null,
102.80333333333334,
105.07119314,
106.60424465333334,
107.04890091,
106.58203846333333
],
"s2": [
null,
97.29333333333332,
98.41315972000002,
99.08681719333332,
99.17163079000001,
98.92204630333333
]
},
"latest": {
"pivot": 101.55414906333333,
"r1": 103.07243937666665,
"s1": 99.95121557666666,
"r2": 104.67537286333332,
"s2": 98.43292526333333
},
"parameters": {},
"diagnostics": {
"causal": true,
"input_count": 96
}
}Diagrams#
Calculation flow#
Classic and Floor-Trader Pivot Points calculation flow
flowchart LR
A["closed OHLC bars or causally confirmed pivots with session"] --> B["Validate order, basis, and finite values"]
B --> C["Apply the selected Classic and Floor-Trader Pivot Points convention"]
C --> D["Emit value, readiness, and diagnostics"]
D --> E["Interpret descriptively; test outcomes separately"]
B -->|invalid or insufficient| X["Withhold output with a reason"]
Classic and Floor-Trader Pivot Points readiness and evidence states
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Waiting
Waiting --> Ready: enough valid causal observations
Waiting --> Rejected: malformed or unsupported input
Ready --> Calculated: selected formula applied
Calculated --> Interpreted: diagnostic and limitation retained
Interpreted --> Ready: next observation arrives
Rejected --> Waiting: corrected input and deterministic reset
How it works#
This page states the contract — how to call it correctly. The article explains the concept: why it works, and where it breaks.
References#
- CFA Institute technical-analysis overview — see linked primary or authoritative record
- TA-Lib maintained source — see linked primary or authoritative record
- Long-Term Storage Capacity of Reservoirs — see linked primary or authoritative record
- Evidence decision
- Level 1 evidence map